Thakur Harinath Singh v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-30. Thakur Harinath Singh v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 3183 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY Between: Thakur Harinath Singh, S/o. Devi Singh, Aged about. 64 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 7-1-6613, Panagal Nafgonda Mandal and District. Telangana State. ... PETITIONER AND 1 . The State of Telangana, . Rep. by its Principal Secretary. Municipal Ad ministratio n Dep-a rtment, Secretariat, Hyd erabad. 2. Municipal Commissioner, Nalgonda Municipality. Nalgonda District. 3. Station House Officer, Natgonda llTown Police Station. Nalgonda District. T ...
RESPONDENTS praying Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therdwith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a virit or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents herein more a particularly the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 herein in not proceeding in accordance with the lefter Lr. G1/1995812025 dated 13. 11. 2025 issued by respondent No. 2 illegal encroachments in the land of the petitioner falling in Sy. No. 144414, admeasuring Ac. 0. 2750 Guntas, and 14441A2, Ac. 2. Og Guntas, total admeasuring Ac. 2-35 Guntas, situated at Pangal Village, Nalgonda Town, is as illegal, arbitrary contrary to law and violative of Articles 14, 15, 16 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia apart from being violative of principle of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.
2 and 3 herein to Remove all the illegal encroachments from the property of the petitioner thereby enabling the petitioner to fence around open land in Sy. No. 14441A, admeasuring Ac. o. 21so Guntas, and 1444tA2, Ac. 2. 0g Guntas, totat admeasuring Ac. 2-3b Guntas, situated at Pangal Village, Nalgonda Town, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein to Remove all the illegal encroachments from the property of the petitioner thereby -cabting the petitioner to fence around open land in sy. No. 1444tA, admeasuring, Ac. o. 27so Guntas, and 14441A2, Ac. 2. 08 Guntas, total admeasuring Ac 2-35 Guntas, situated at Pangal village, Nargonda Town, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI M. A. MUJEEB Counsel for the Respondent No.
1: GP FOR MC'L ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: SRt PUTTA KRISHNA REDD', SC FOR MUNICIPALITY Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: AGp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER a IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE B. VIIAYSEN REDDY F DATE OF ORDER: 30. 12. 2025 Between: Thakur Harinath Singh . Petitioner AND The State of Telangana Represented by its principal Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and otheis ... Respondents ORDER: (ORAL) Heard Mr. M. A. Mujeeb, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing counsel for respondent No. 2; learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for respondent No. 3; t \ I and perused the material on record. \ 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the order dated 07. 03. 2025 was passed by this courr in w. p. No. 6970 of 2025 directing respondent No.
2 to take steps for executing of the speaking order dated 23. 09. 2024 for removing . the unauthorized construction made by respondents No. 3 and 4 therein, however, the same was not complied with. Though there is internal correspondence between respondents No. 2 and 3, no action has been taken, as such, the petitioner is constrained to approach this court. n 3' As innocuous relief is sought by the petitioner and that his grievance is only with regard to the non-imprementation of the speaking order dated 23'09'2024' this writ petition is disposed of directing respondents No. 2 and 3 ; to comply with the order dated 07. 03. 2025 passed by this court in I w. P. No. 6970 of 2025 by implementing the speaking order dated 23. 0g. 2024 for removing the unauthorized construction made by respondents No. 3 and 4 in the said writ petition, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. I .
As a sequel thereto, misceilaneous apprications, if any, pending in this writ petition, stand closed. SD/. P. PONNA KRISHNA ASssreNT REGISTRAR (v'1 /TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Department' Secretariat' Administiation 1. The Principal Secretary. Municipal Hyderabad. 2. The Municipal Commissioner, Nalgonda Municipatity. Nalgonda District' I Police station' Nalgonda House Nalgonda ll Town 3. The station officer, District. M. A' MUJEEB' Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI 5. oneCCtoSRIPUTTAKRISHNAREDDY,ScFoRMUNICIPALITY[oPUCl 6. TwoCCstoGPFoRMcPl-4P}/lN&URBANDEV,HighCourtfortheState of t"tangana at HYderabad ' TOUTI court forthe state of Telangana at 7. Two ccs to GP FOR HOME, High Hyderabad . tOUTl 8. Two CD CoPies PMK BS w tg I HIGH COURT DATED:30/1 212025 S TA 1HE Ie t z o 2t? u Ct ORDER 0 B JrN / t WP. No. 40017 of 2025 t t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS lut il)
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.