M/S. GOLINE NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF KERALA
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-04-03. M/S. GOLINE NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF KERALA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN RD WEDNESDAY, THE 3 DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 13540 OF 2024 PETITIONER: M/S. GOLINE NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED 41/256 E3, KHADEEJA BUILDING, NEAR NORTH RAILWAY STATION, COCHIN ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR. MOHAMMED SHANEEJ P, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O MOHAMMED ALI, POOZHIKUTH (H), MANJERI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676121,PIN-68201 BY ADVS. SIDHARTH O. SUSANTH SHAJI ALBIN A. JOSEPH RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFIARS, SECRETARIATE, TRIVANDRUM,, PIN – 695001 2 DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, WAYANAD, DOORDARSAN RELAY CENTRE, WAYANAD , KERALA, PIN – 673122 3 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MEENANGADI POLICE STATION MEENANGADI POLICE STATION, MEENANGADI, KERALA.
, PIN – 673591 4 HEADLOAD WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, DISTRICT COMMITTEE, WAYANAD DISTRICT, PALAKKUNNEL BUILDING, MUNDERY ROAD, ANAPPALAM JUNCTION, KALPETTA, WAYANAD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN – 673121 5 BHARATHIYA MAZDHOOR SANG (BMS), BMS BHAVAN, MARAYIL LINE CHITTOOR ROAD, KOCHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PRESIDENT,, PIN – 682018 6 INDIAN NATIONAL TRADE UNION CONGRESS (INTUC) INTUC STATE COMMITTEE OFFICE, K. KARUNAKARAN SMARAKA INTUC MANDIRAM, T. C. 43/1027 (7) PARUTHIKUZHY, MANACAUD P. O. TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PRESIDENT, PIN – 695009 WPC 13540/24 7 CENTER OF INDIAN TRADE UNION (CITU) CITU STATE COMMITTEE OFFICE, E. BALANANDHAN SMARAKA MANDHIRAM, THAMBANOOR, TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE SECRETARY, PIN – 695001 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03. 04.
2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WPC 13540/24 JUDGMENT When this matter was called today, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this Writ Petition, with liberty being reserved to his client to approach this Court again appropriately. Consequently, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn; with the afore requested liberty being reserved to the petitioner. Sd/- RR DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.