SHRI NIECHULO CHIERIE v. STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-04-22. SHRI NIECHULO CHIERIE v. STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC020001932024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/57/2024 SHRI NIECHULO CHIERIE S/O CHIECHU CHIERI R/O PFUTSERO TOWN PHEK NAGALAND VERSUS STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF NAGALAND 2:THE FINANCE COMMISSIONER DEPT. OF FINANCE NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PHED NAGALAND KOHIMA 4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PHED NAGALAND KOHIMA 5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHED PHEK DIVISION NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : TAKA KICHU Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL Page No. # 2/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 22. 04. 2024 Heard Mr. T Kichu, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. S. Chang, learned counsel for the respondents.
This is an application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying for a direction asking the State Respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner for regularizing his services in the Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Nagaland. On 07. 02. 1994, the petitioner was appointed as a work-charged Chowkidar in the Public Health Engineering Department, Sub Division Pfutsero, Government of Nagaland and since then, he has been serving as a work-charged Chowkidar and completed 30 (thirty) years of continuous service. On 17. 03. 2015, the State Respondents issued an Office Memorandum No. AR-3/GEN-201/2009 whereby the State Respondents have decided to regularize the services of the work-charged employees, who have completed 30 (thirty) years of continuous service after 01. 01. 2015. On the basis of the said Memorandum, the petitioner filed a representation before the concerned authorities and the said representation is yet to be considered.
After hearing the learned counsel for both the sides, it is hereby directed that the State Respondents shall consider the representation filed by the present petitioner within next 2 (two) months of receiving this order and shall pass appropriate order. Page No. # 3/3 With the above, the present writ petition (civil) is disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.