FARHAT BEGUM v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR (REVENUE) AND ORS.
Court: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jammu and Kashmir judgment dated 2024-08-31. FARHAT BEGUM v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR (REVENUE) AND ORS. Read the judgment and...
Judgment text
S. no. 122 Suppl list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP (C) no. 1949/2024 Farhat Begum …. Applicant(s) Through: Mr Arif Sikander Mir, Advocate v. Union Territory of JK and others … Respondent(s) Through: Mr Mubashir Malik, DyAG CORAM: Hon’ble Ms Justice Moksha Khajuria Kazmi, Judge ORDER 31. 08. 2024 01/- By this petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction upon the respondents to demarcate her land measuring 5 Kanals and 8 marlas falling under khasra No. 944 min Mouza Kanispora, District Baramulla. 02/- Precisely, the petitioner is stated to be owner in possession of land measuring 5 kanals and 8 marlas falling under khasra No. 944 min situated at Mouza Kanispora District Baramulla, after having purchased the same from Nazir Ahmad Shah R/o Drugmulla District Baramulla, presently residing at Kanispora Baramulla.
A litigation in the shape of a civil suit in respect of the said land was going on in the court of Special Mobile Magistrate, Baramulla, in case titled Farhat Begum v. Nazir Ahmad Shah, which ultimately was decreed in favour of the petitioner on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the parties. Subsequent, thereto, the land in question was also mutated in favour of the petitioner. 03/- The sole concern projected through the medium of this petition is that the said land was requested to be demarcated through an application by the petitioner made to the Assistant Commissioner Revenue, Baramulla, who deputed Tehsildar concerned to conduct Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Page 1 of 2 WP (C) No. 1949/2024 necessary proceedings in the matter. However, the demarcation sought for by the petitioner has not yet been made.
Therefore, a direction is being sought for to the respondents for making necessary demarcation of the land falling under survey no. 944 min Mouza Kanispora. 04/- Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he would feel satisfied if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to demarcate the aforesaid land of the petitioner within a reasonable timeframe. 05/- Mr Mubashir Malik, Dy. AG, present in the court is not averse to such proposition made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 06/- Given the nature of the dispute raised, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at its threshold and it is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to act on the application of the petitioner seeking demarcation of her land measuring 5 kanals and 8 marlas falling under khasra no.
944 min situated at Mouza Kanispora, Baramulla and make the necessary demarcation in terms of applicable law within a period of one month from the date copy of this order is served upon them. 07/- Disposed of on the above lines along with connected CM. (Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge Srinagar 31. 08. 2024 Mohammad Yaseen Dar, PS Whether the order is speaking: Yes Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Page 2 of 2 WP (C) No. 1949/2024
Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.