Former Governing Body Royal Academy of Law Oinam v. RK Dinesh Singh IAS and Anr
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2026-01-20. Former Governing Body Royal Academy of Law Oinam v. RK Dinesh Singh IAS and Anr. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
Digitally KABOR signed by Item no. 61 KABORAMBA AMBAMM LARSON IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR Date: LARSO 2026. 01. 22 AT IMPHAL 12:27:24 N +05'30' Cont. Cas(C) No. 97 of 2025 Former Governing Body Royal Academy of Law Oinam …. Petitioner - Versus - RK Dinesh Singh IAS and Anr. …. Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA ORDER 21. 01. 2026 [1] Present Ms. Linda, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. N. Tejpriya, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1. [2] The present contempt petition has been filed for non-compliance of the direction of this Court in order dated 06. 03. 2025 in W. P. (C) No. 184 of 2025 with a direction to the State respondents to complete the process of election of new Governing Body of the Royal Academy of Law, Oinam as per Rules of Manipur Education Code, preferably within a period of 4(four) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. [3] The respondent no. 2 has filed a letter dated 19. 08.
2025 issued by Director (University & Higher Education), Govt. of Manipur to the Principal of Royal Academy of Law, Oinam acknowledging the constitution of new Governing Body of Royal Academy of Law, Oinam. [4] Ms. N. Tejpriya, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 submits that with the issuance of letter dated 19. 08. 2025, the cause of the contempt petition does not survive. [5] This Court has perused the materials on record and it is of the view that with the issuance of subsequent order dated 19. 08. 2025, the cause of the contempt petition does not survive. [6] Accordingly, the Cont. Cas(C) No. 97 of 2025 is closed. JUDGE Thoiba
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.