Skip to main content
LawSphereX

PREMALATA DAS v. STATE OF ODISHA

Court: High Court of Orissa

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2025-10-24. PREMALATA DAS v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W. P. (C) No. 29450 of 2025 Premalata Das .. …... Petitioner(s) Mr. Soubhagya Swain, Adv. -Versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ……. Opposite Party (s) Mr. Rajdeep Pradhan, ASC CORAM: DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI ORDER 24. 10. 2025 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayer: “The petitioner therefore prays that your lordship may graciously be pleased to consider the facts stated above admit the writ application, issue notice to the opposite parties, call records from the opposite parties and after hearing of the parties issue a writ/writs in the nature of certiorari/ mandamus direct the O. P. No. 3 to consider representation under Annexure-1 and remove illegal obstruction/ encroachment from the public road vide Plot No. 871, Khata No.

716, Mouza- Bhubaneswar Sahar, Unit-31, Laxmisagar-2, Khurda within a fixed period of time. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray. ” Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Designation: P. A. Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 24-Oct-2025 18:12:04 4. At the outset, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has filed a representation dated 05. 06. 2025 vide Annexure-1 before the Opposite Party No. 3/The Zonal Deputy Commissioner, BMC for redressal of his grievance. The said representation is still pending. 5. In view of such facts and submission, without going into the merit of the case, the Opposite Party No. 3/ The Zonal Deputy Commissioner, BMC is directed to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner vide Annexure-1 by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of fifteen days from the date of production/presentation of a certified copy of this order. 6.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. ( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Murmu Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Designation: P. A. Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 24-Oct-2025 18:12:04

Source: High Court of Orissa. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.