VIJAY BHANDARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-10. VIJAY BHANDARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7200 of 2024 ----- Vijay Bhandari, S/o Late Sitaram Bhandari, village Jama, P. O. & P. S. Jama, District Dumka. .......... Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .......... Opp. Party. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State : None ----- Order No. 06 Date: 10. 12. 2024 1. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code; and Sections 103 & 104 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999; and Sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act, 1957. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and has not committed any offence as alleged. There is alleged recovery of 7 Tins (15 kg. each) filled with refined oil and pasted with forged wrappers of Gagan Active Soyabean Refined Oil Company; 40 empty Tins (15 kg.
each) pasted with forged wrapper of the said Company; and 1508 pieces of forged wrappers of Gagan Active Soyabean Refined Oil from the house of the petitioner. It is further alleged that the petitioner was not authorized to use the name of Bunge Gagan Active Refined Soyabean Oil with respect to manufacturing, packaging, re-labling, whole-selling and distributing and, therefore, he misused the wrapper of the said Company and also caused damage to its business reputation. In fact, no such article/goods has been recovered from the house of the petitioner. The petitioner is a private tutor and has no concern with the alleged offence. He has no criminal antecedent, as has been stated in paragraph no. 11 of the present anticipatory bail application. The petitioner, however, undertakes to co-operate in ongoing investigation of the case. Hence, he may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. 3. No one appears on behalf of the State. 4.
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the materials available on record, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, in event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within three weeks from today, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount, each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dumka, in connection with Jama P. S. Case no. 15 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B. N. S. S. , 2023. (Rajesh Shankar, J. ) Sanjay/ -2- A. B. A. No. 7200 of 2024
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.