Chinthireddy Devender reddy v. Athmakur Akash
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-09-26. Chinthireddy Devender reddy v. Athmakur Akash. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEI4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT ,: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH l. A. No. 2 of 2025 IN/AND CIVIL REVISI ON PETITION NO: 3534 OF 202s Petition under Articre 227 of the constitution of rndia, aggrieved by the order made o. s. sR. No. 103 st2ozs in dared B-7 -202s on the fire of the court of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, at Bhongir. Between: Chinthireddy Devender re_Qd-y, Late Raji Reddy, Aged 51 years, Occ. -S/o Business. R/o H. No. 2-1 1-210r3o4. Shashank'Naqar boroiv, Bharithiva virrva Bhavan, Road-3, Vidyaranyapuri, Hanamkonda_50d009 ... Petitioner/Plaintiff AND '1 . Athmakur Akash, S/o Vallabadas, Aged about 37 years, Occ. Business, R/o ' A-1203, Yeiahanka New Town, Benlaluru, Karnataka State_5600064. 2 ygnam Parvathi, W/o Venam Durgaiah, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Housewife, -' R/o H. No.
1-11-9l9l3, Narsuked Shanthi N-agar Cotony, ivteOJkio;", M;a;i District. .. RespondenUDefendant lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 149 of CpC RA/V 15. 1 of CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the p. iitiin, the High court may be pleased to grant extension of time by invoking S. 149 of cpc-to make good the deficit court fee within a period of 4 months from today. Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Kunal Kakkad representing Sri B. Mohan Counsel for the Respondents : - The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH I. A. No. 2 of 2o25 inland CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3534 OF 2025 ORDER: This Civil Rer"ision Petition is filed aggrieved by the Docket '2025 passcd in O. S'SR'No'lO35,r 2025 by the Order dated Oa. O7 Prir-rcipal District arld Sessions Judge, Bhongir' 2. Hearcl Sri Kunal Kakkad, learned counsel representing Sri B. Mohan, learned counsei for the petitioner and perused the entire material on record. 3.
Learned counsel lor the petitioner submits that the suit filed by thc' pctitioner wras returned on the ground that the petitioner/plaintiff sought relief for Rs. 7,00,70,000/-but the The petitioner paid court lee oniy to the extent of Rs'72,526 l-counsel for the plaintiff in the said suit submitted that the plaintiff would give undertaking that if the suit ends in his favour then he u'ill pay the court fee on alternative relief' However, the Court fee to be paid by the party should not be \ \ \ . ''l.. conditional depending on the happening of some future event. Therefore' it is not as ir the praintifr complied the objec{ions and hence, the suit was returned. Aggrieved by the saicl action, the pctitioner. prelerred the presenr CRp. 4. Learned counsei for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner hacl given an undertaking to pay the amount lor deficit Court fee within four (04) months trom today by filing I. A. lJc. 2 ol 2O2S in C. R. p. No. 3534 of 2025 under Section 149 of C.
P. C. ln view of the same, iearned counsel requested to set aside the docket orrler dated OB. OZ. 2O2S in O. S. SR. No. 1O35 /2025 passecl by the principal District and Sessions Judge, Bhongir and direct the trial Court to number the suit and grant time to pay deficit Court lee under Sectio n 149 of the Code of Civil Procedure 5. Alter hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and on a perusal of the material available on record, without going into merits of the case, the I. A. No. 2 of 2O2S in C. R. P. No. 3534 of 2O2S as well as the C. R. p. No. 35 34 of 2O2S arc \ \ I disposed of directing the Principal District and Sessions Judge' Bhongir to number the O. S'SR No'1035/2025 hled bv the revision petitior-rer. on its file, subject to condition that the petitionerhastodepositthedelrcitCourtfeewithinthr. ee(03) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order' petitions pencling, il any, in this revision Miscellaneous petttton shal1 stirnd closed s. l/- K.
BHAVANI SWAMY ISSISTNHT REGISTRAR G //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Bhongir District and Sessions Judge' at The Principal B. tr4ohan, Advocate IOPUC] 2 One CC to Sri Two CD CoPies DL HIGH COURT DATED:26/09/2025 -\ ii ? 1: ii ) 1 ORDER lr n ;i I I . JT zffi = 5'f ,. ) !! l. A. No. 2 of 2025 . ,y,, ,,... ,? . |... IN/AND . '.. - CRP. No. 3534 of 2025 . :\- t. A. NO. 2 0F 2025 AND CRP NO. 3534 OF 2025 ARE DISPOSED OF 1P fc
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.