Meera Kumari v. The State of Bihar
Court: Patna High Court
Bench: MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
Patna High Court judgment dated 2024-06-20. Meera Kumari v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5245 of 2020 ====================================================== Meera Kumari W/o Dilip Kumar, R/o Village- Gadhia Kumar Khand, P. O. and P. S. - Kumar Khand, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary (Male), Bihar Govt. , Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary (Male), Deptt. of Education, Bihar Govt. , Patna. 3. The Principal Secretary (Male), Deptt. of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of India, Patna. 4. The Director (Male), Mass Education, Bihar Govt. , Patna. 5. The District Programm Officer (Literacy) (Male) Madhepura-cum-Distt Adult Education Officer, Madhepura. 6. The Dist. Magistrate, Madhepura (Male). 7. The Secretary, Central Adult Education Council, Madhepura (Male), District Magistrate, Madhepura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None.
For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Binita Singh (SC28) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 3 20-06-2024 Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner however, counsel for the Union of India is present. 2. Vide order dated 20. 04. 2024, it transpires to this Court that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and as a matter of last indulgence, this case was adjourned for one week with specific direction that if none appears on behalf of the petitioner on the next date fixed, appropriate order shall be passed. Today also, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner. 3. In this background, it transpires to this Court that Patna High Court CWJC No. 5245 of 2020(3) dt. 20-06-2024 2/2 the petitioner is not interested to pursue this writ application and therefore, this Court has no option left, but to pass the order in this writ application. 4.
In this view of the matter, the present writ application stands dismissed due to non-prosecution. (Dr. Anshuman, J. ) Prakashmani/- U
Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.