SOLEN SANGMA v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2024-05-21. SOLEN SANGMA v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 11 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 56 of 2024 Date of Decision: 21. 05. 2024 Shri. Solen Sangma S/o Sanjeng Marak R/o Sokadam Balading Songsak, East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya :::Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Union of India Represented by Secretary, Ministry of Communication, New Delhi. 2. The Chief Post Master General, North East Circle, Shillong, Meghalaya. 3. The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Meghalaya Division, Shillong. 4. The Assistant Superintendent of Post, West Garo Hills District, Tura. 5. The Sub-Post Master, Sub-Post Office, Williamnagar, East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. :::Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. A. G. Momin, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with Ms. A. Pradhan, Adv. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc. : ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No Oral: 1. A communication dated 20. 05.
2024, has been produced by the learned DSGI for the respondents, wherein it is stated that 3(three) months’ time is required to process the case of the petitioner, inasmuch as, some original passbooks are not in the custody of the respondents. 2. In view of this development, Mr. A. G. Momin, learned counsel for the petitioner who is also in receipt of a copy of the letter, submits that the matter can be closed at this stage. 3. Dr. N. Mozika, learned DSGI for the respondents is also directed to ensure that the dues of the writ petitioner are paid within a period of 3(three) months by the concerned respondents. 4. Writ petition accordingly stands closed and disposed of, giving the respondents 3(three) months’ time from today, to settle the dues as claimed by the petitioner. 5. Petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court, in the event if these directions are not complied with. Judge Meghalaya 21. 05. 2024 “D. Thabah-PS”
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.