NARESH v. RAMESHWAR AND ANOTHER
Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Bench: MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Punjab and Haryana judgment dated 2025-09-26. NARESH v. RAMESHWAR AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
107. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHCHANDIGARH CRR(F)CRR(F)-1038-2025 (O&M) Date of decision:Date of decision: 26. 09. 2025 Naresh .... Petitioner Versus Rameshwar and anotherRameshwar and another .... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMARNAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Raj Wadhwa, Advocate, andMr. Raj Wadhwa, Advocate, and Ms. Sunita Wadhwa, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sunita Wadhwa, Advocate, for the petitioner. ----- NAMIT KUMARNAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) 1. By way of present criminal revision petition, the petitionerBy way of present criminal revision petition, the petitioner--son has challenged the order dated 11. 08. 2023 passed by learned Principalson has challenged the order dated 11. 08. 2023 passed by learned Principalson has challenged the order dated 11. 08. 2023 passed by learned Principalson has challenged the order dated 11. 08.
2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jind, whereby in a petition filed by the respondentsJudge, Family Court, Jind, whereby in a petition filed by the respondentsJudge, Family Court, Jind, whereby in a petition filed by the respondentsJudge, Family Court, Jind, whereby in a petition filed by the respondents under Section 125 Cr. P. C. for grant of maintenunder Section 125 Cr. P. C. for grant of maintenunder Section 125 Cr. P. C. for grant of maintenance, he has been ordered toance, he has been ordered to pay Rs. 12,000/pay Rs. 12,000/- per month (Rs. 6,000/- to respondent No. 1 and Rs. 6,000/to respondent No. 1 and Rs. 6,000/- to to respondent No. 2). respondent No. 2). 2.
After arguing for sometime and realizing thatand realizing that this Court is not this Court is not inclinedinclinedinclinedinclined to to to to interfere interfere interfere interfere in in in in the the the the impugned impugned impugned impugned order, order, order, order, learned learned learned learned counsel counsel counsel counsel for for for for the the the the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition. wishes to withdraw the present petition. wishes to withdraw the present petition. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE September 26September 26, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.