RAMDAYAL DHAKAD (VERMA) v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-16. RAMDAYAL DHAKAD (VERMA) v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE th ON THE 16 OF JANUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 690 of 2024 BETWEEN:- RAMDAYAL DHAKAD (VERMA) S/O SHRI CHINGARAM DHAKAD, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIRED, RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 13, NEAR HANUMAN MANDIR, DISTRICT SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (BY SHRI PALLAV AWASTHI - ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF HOME GUARD AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. DISTRICT COMMANDANT, HOME GUARD OFFICE, DISTRICT SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (SHRI K. S.
TOMAR - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR STATE) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred seeking following reliefs :- " ( i ) The Respondent may kindly be directed to pay accumulated amount of Sanchit Nidhi in favour of the petitioner along with the interest @ 12% PA till the date Signature Not Verified Signed by: PAWAN KUMAR Signing time: 17-01-2024 11:30:59 AM of its actual realization. (ii) To grant any relief deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. " 2. At the outset, Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in respect of the grievance of the petitioner, he wants to prefer a representation before the respondents/authorities who may be directed to decide his representation in accordance with law in a time bound manner. 3.
Per contra, learned Government Advocate appearing for the the State has submitted that if the petitioner files a representation then the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law within a time bound period. 4. Looking to the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner which is not opposed by the other side, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation alongwith all relevant documents before the concerned respondent No. 3/competent authority, who in turn is directed to decide the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. If the petitioner is found eligible then amount of Sanchit Nidhi shall be released forthwith. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition stands disposed of. 7. E-copy/certified copy as per Rules. (MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE pwn* Signature Not Verified Signed by: PAWAN KUMAR Signing time: 17-01-2024 11:30:59 AM
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.