K. Venkat Ram Reddy v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-13. K. Venkat Ram Reddy v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
\ [ 3302 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 11161 OF 2026 Between: K. Venkat Ram Reddy, S/o Keshava Reddy, Age. 61 years, Occ. Retd. School Assistant (Social), ZPHS Panthini, Hanumakonda District R/o H. No. 2-10-79618, Teachers Colony, Waddepally, Hanamkonda - 506370. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rept. by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, 2. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Government of Telangana, lnsurance Buildings, Abids, Hyderabad. 3. The District Treasury Officer, Hanumakonda District. 4. The Sub-Treasury Officer, Hanumakonda, Hanumakonda District. 5. The District Educational Officer, Hanumakonda District. .....
RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or orders more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the impugned action of the respondents in not releasing and paying the retirement benefits, such as Gratuity (TS) amount of Rs. 2,85,008/- with Token No. 2600963000 Dt. 06/08/2025, Gratuity (CS) amount of Rs. 13,14,992/-with Token No. 2600962976 Dt. OOtO8l2O25, Commutation (TS) amount of Rs. 4,29,5411- with Token No. 2600963042 Dt. O6tOBl2O25, Commutation (CS) amount of Rs. 19,81,850/-with Token No. 2600963021 Dt. 06/08/2025, EL and HPL amount of Rs. 14,77,2O8l- with Token No. 2600998747 Dt. O7lOBl2O25, GPF amount of Rs. 24,24,888/-with Cheque/Token No. 2603393661 Dt. 1910212026, GIS amount of Rs. 63,628/- with Token No. 2602264345 Dt. 031121202s, pRC Arrears (1) amount of Rs. Token No. 2600933745 Dt.
04n$l202\ pRC Arrears (2) amount of Rs. Token No. 2600933800 Dt. 04lo*l202s, pRC Arrears (3) amount of Rs. Token No. 2600933813 Dt. 041081202s, pRC Anears (4) amount of Token No. 26()0933829 Dt. o4l0\l2o2' pRC Arrears (s) amount of Rs. Token No. 26co933762 Dt. 04l0\l2o2s, pRC Arrears (6) amount of Rs. Token No. 26c0933845 ot. 04t09t202s, pRC Arrears (7) amount of Rs. Token No. 2600933902 Dt. 04l0\l2o2\ pRC Arrears (8) amount of Rs. Token No. 2600933941 ot. 04l0$t2o2s, pRC Arrears (9) amount of Rs. Token No. 2600933967 Dt. o4r0al2o21 pRC Anears (10) amount with roken No. 2600933861 Dt. o4lo$t2o25, pRc Arrears (11) 28,698/- with roken No. 26009338ss Dt. pRC o4lo$l2o2s and Arrears of Rs. 28,700/- with roken No. 260093735s Dt. o4lo8/2025, is illegal, and violation ,;f Articles 14,21 and 3oo(A) of the constitution consequently clirect the respondents to release the said benefits interest 1Bo/o PA on @ belated payments. A.
NO Petition tjnder Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased the respondentr; in not releasing and pay the retirement benefits of the such as, Gratuitv (TS) amount of Rs. 2,85,008/-with roken t{o. 2600963000 0610812025, Gratuity (cS) amount of Rs. 13,14,992/- with roken No. 2600962976 0610812025, ccrmmutation (TS) amount of Rs. 4,29,541/- with 2600963042 Dt. 06/08/202s, commutation (cS) amount of Rs. 19,81,850/- Token No. 2600963021 Dt. 06/o8/202s, EL and HpL amount of Rs. 14,77,208/- with Token No. 26Ot)998747 Dt. 07l0Bl2O2S, GpF amount of Rs. 24,24,888t- cheque/Token Irlo. 2603393661 Dt. 19to2tzo26, Gls amount of Rs. 63,628/- Token No. 26022'64345 Dt. o3t12l2o2s, pRC Arears (1) amount of Rs. Token No. 26009,33745 Dt. o4lo1l2o2s, pRC Arears (2) amount of Rs. Token No. 2600933800 Dt. o4lo$l2o2s, pRC Anears (3) amount of Rs. Token No. 2600933813 Dt. 14lo$lzo2s, pRC Arrears (4) amount of Rs. Token No.
2600933829 Dt. 04l0\l2o2s, pRC Arrears (5) amount of Rs. Token No. 2600933762 Dt. 04lo$l2o2s, pRC Anears (6) amount of Rs. 28,700/- with Token No. 2600933845 Dt. o4t0al2o2s, pRC Arears (7) amount of Rs. 28,698/-with Token No. 2600933902 Dt. 0410812025, PRC Anears (8) amount of Rs. 28,699/- with Token No. 2600933941 Dt. 0410812025, PRC Anears (9) amount of Rs. 28,700/- with Token No. 2600933967 Dl. O4lOBl2O25, PRC Arrears (10) amount of Rs. 28,6991 with Token No. 2600933867 Dt. O4tOBt2O25, PRC Arrears (11) amount of Rs. 28,698/- with Token No. 2600933855 Dl. O4lO8l2O25 and PRC Anears (12) amount of Rs. 28,700/- with Token No. 2600937355 Dl. O4lOAl2O25, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P. UGENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : AGP FOR SERVICES -lll The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH 1[IRIT PETITION No. 11161 of 2o/26 Date: 13.
o,4. 20. 26 Between: K. Venkat Ram ReddY Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its PrinciPal Secretary, Finance Department and others ... Respondents ORDE R: for the Hearc sri P. Ugender Reddy, learned counsel petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-lll appearing for thc respondents and perused the material c,n record.. with their consent, this writ Petition is taken up fbr disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. Learned. counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the instant Writ Petition questioning the action of the respondents in not releasing the petitioner's retiral benefits, despite token numbers having already been raised by the respond. ent authorities for payment of the amounts payable to the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the lfs raised in the present Writ Petition has already been adjudicated by the Division Bench of this Court in W. P. No.
23138 of 2025, which was disposed of uide order dated O3. O9 . 2025, and thus prayed to pass a similar order in the present Writ Petition also. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-lll did not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner with regard to the disposal of W. P. No. 23138 of 2025 dated 03. 09. 2025 and submits that the respondents will release the amounts on a priority basis of the token numbers and prayed this Court to pass appropriate orders. 5. Having regard to the above made submissions and for the reasons alike in the order dated O3. O9. 2O25 passed by'the Division Bench of this Court in W. P. No.
23138 of 2025, this Writ / ,r / i Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to ensure that the entire amount payable to the petitioner is released as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks frorn today, failing which, the entire amount with regard to the retiral benefits shall carry interest at the rate of 1O% per annum, from the date the amount fell due, till the actual date of its paymerrt. Misce'llaneous petitions pending, if &fly, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. There shali be no order as to costs. SD/- A. SREENIVASA REDDY STANT REGISTRAR 1n //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To \] 1. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat, State of Telangana at Hyderalrad. 2. The Dire,:tor of Treasuries and Accounts, Government of Telangana, Insurance Buildings, Abids, Hyderabad. 3. The Distrir;t Treasury Officer, Hanumakonda District. 4. The Sub-I'reasury Officer, Hanumakonda, Hanumakonda District. 5.
The Distrit:t Educational Officer, Hanumakonda District. 6. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-IIl, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabarr. IOUTI 7. One CC tcr SRI P. UGENDER REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CD Copies SA w r' C. C. TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 1 1_ hiE S o 2 1 APR 2026 * Dn \ (\*. I. -'.. - '' ORDER WP. No. 11161 of 2026 DISPOSING'OF THE W. P AT THE ST'AGE OF ADMISSION :, WITHOUT COSTS. i t ' ! {. I r'6& Ir\ ! t. 7' x$ ; I
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.