Thipparthi Rajinikanth v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-11-03. Thipparthi Rajinikanth v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITIO NO: 14189 OF 2025 Between: 1 Thipparthi Rajinikanth, S/o Hanmandlu, Aged about 41 years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o H. No. 7-6-103, Opposite Street of Gram Panchayat, Vemulawada, Rajanna Sircilla District. 2. Thipparthi Bhulaxmi, Wo Hanmandlu, Aged about 67 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o H. No. 7-6-103, Opposite Street of Gram Panchayat, Vemulawada, Rajanna Sircilla District. 3. Thipparthi Hanmandlu, S/o Simhadri, Aged about 72 years, Occ: Business, R/o H. No. 7-6-103, Opposite Street of Gram Panchayat, Vemulawada, Rajanna Sircilla District. ... PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/A. 1 TO A. 3 AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT 2. The Station House Officer, Jagtial Police Station, Jagtial District. ...
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the docket order passed in Crl. M. P. No. 204 of 2025 in CC No. 1149 of 2018 on the file of the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Jagtial dt2910812025 by allowing the petition filed u/s 311 of Cr. P. C. for further cross examination of PWs- 1 to 3 in CC No. 1149 of 2018 l. A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No.
1 149 of 2018 pending on the file of the I Additional Judicial [Magistrate of First Class at Jagtial dt 2910812A25 pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition { ,t This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri BALA MURALI Y, Advocate for petitioners the and SRl. JITHENDER RAO VEERA MALLA, Additionar pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No. 1 & 2 The Court made the foilowing: ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 14189 of 2025 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 3 seeking to quash the order dated 29. 08. 2025 passed in Crl. M. P. No. 204 of 2025 in C. C. No. 1149 of 2O1B on the file of I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Jagtial. 2. Heard Mr. Y.
Bala Murali, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No. 1-State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition was dismissed due to non-representation on the stipulated date, and that it was not heard on merits \ \ \ 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted to \ pass appropriate orders. 5. Perused the record. 6. The impugned docket order dated 29. 08. 2025, which reads as under: *41 to A3 absent, no representation. Cr. M. P. N o. 204/202 5 is dismissed" R 7. The learned Magistrate has not heard both parties, and the petition was dismissed due to non-representation on behalf of accused Nos. 1 to 3. The petition was filed under section 311 ot cr. P. c. , seeking recall of PWs. 1 to 3. This court is not inclined to go into the merits of the recall petition at this stage.
However, the petition must be given a logical conclusion after affording an opportunity of hearing to both parties. Therefore, the learned I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class, Jagtial, is directed to dispose of crl. M. P. No. 204 of 202s in c. c. No. 1149 of 2o1g after hearing both parties on its own merits, without being influenced by any of the observations made by this Court. B. with the above direction, this criminal petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/. T. SRINIVASA REDDY STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Jagtial, Jagtial District 2. The Station House Officer, JagtialTown Police Station, Jagtial, Jagtial District 3. One CC to SRI BALA MURALI Y Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] D. 5. Two CD Copies VM/PSL J \ HIGH COURT DATED: 0311112025 ORDER CRLP. No. 14189 of 2025 "i:.
iii- l. :;. ri :\ t: r. I 1G ler t Iilfr 'r( /. 1'-r.. . :-r. r. ir"'-' DISPOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION € \
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.