BHIMA RANSHIBHAI RATHOD(KOLI) v. STATE OF GUJARAT
Court: High Court of Gujarat
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Gujarat judgment dated 2020-12-23. BHIMA RANSHIBHAI RATHOD(KOLI) v. STATE OF GUJARAT. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
R/SCR. A/8725/2020 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 8725 of 2020 ================================================================ BHIMA RANSHIBHAI RATHOD(KOLI) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ================================================================ Appearance: ANIL H PATEL(7832) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR MAHESH K POOJARA(5879) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3 MS SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ================================================================ CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. S. SUPEHIA Date : 23/12/2020 ORAL ORDER Rule. Leaned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent-state. 1. By way of the present petition, the petition-accused has prayed to release him on parole leave for a period of 30 days on the ground of making arrangement of fees to engage an advocate. 2.
I have heard the learned advocates appearing for the parties and have also perused the documents produced along with the petition as well as considered the averments made in the petition. Considering the grounds mentioned and the averments made in the petition, the petition deserves to be allowed. 3. Accordingly the petition stands PARTLY allowed. The petitioner-accused is ordered to be released on parole leave for a period of 10 days from the date of his actual date of release, on executing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) before the jail authority and on usual terms and conditions as may be imposed by the jail authority. 4. The petitioner-accused shall surrender before the jail authority after completion of his parole leave, without fail. R/SCR. A/8725/2020 ORDER 5. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
Registry is directed to intimate the concerned jail authority and the concerned Court about the present order by sending a copy of this order through Fax message, email and/or any other suitable electronic mode. 6. Learned advocate for the petitioner is also permitted to send a copy of this order to the concerned jail authority and the concerned Court through Fax message, email and/or any other suitable electronic mode. Sd/- . (A. S. SUPEHIA, J) NEHA GUPTA///ABHISHEK
Source: High Court of Gujarat. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.