SANGLAKPAM NANDABAPU SHARMA AND 18 OTHERS v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 4 OTHERS
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-12-09. SANGLAKPAM NANDABAPU SHARMA AND 18 OTHERS v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 4 OTHERS. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
Item No. 18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 752 of 2023 Sanglakpam Nandabapu Sharma & 18 Ors. …Petitioners - Versus - State of Manipur & 4 Ors. …Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA O R D E R 09-12-2024 [1] Heard Mr. S. Rupachandra, learned senior counsel assisted by Md. Shahidur Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Mr. S. Jasobanta, learned counsel for respondent No. 5. [2] The petitioners approached this Court inter alia praying for a direction to set aside the deduction chart dated 03-10-2023 and the others issued by the Office of the Principal Accountant General (A&E), Manipur from the pensionary benefits of the petitioners. In this respect, the petitioners have also submitted a joint representation dated 11-10-2023 to the respondents regarding refund of the deducted amount from the retiral benefits.
It is stated that the representation is still pending with the respondents. [3] Mr. S. Rupachandra, learned senior counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of by directing the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 11-10-2023 by a speaking order within a stipulated time. [4] Mr. Sh. Shyam Sharma, learned Government Advocate and Mr. S. Jasobanta, learned counsel for the respondents, have no objection to dispose of the writ petition by passing an innocuous order by directing the respondents to dispose of the representation. [5] Recording the submission made at the Bar, the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioners by a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. [6] It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case.
[7] Furnish copy of this order to the learned counsel appearing for the parties. JUDGE Victoria Digitally signed NINGOM by NINGOMBAM BAM VICTORIA Date: 2024. 12. 10 VICTORIA15:26:49 +05'30'
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.