REMA S v. RENUKA DEVI
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2025-04-10. REMA S v. RENUKA DEVI. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2025:KER:31186 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T. R. RAVI TH THURSDAY, THE 10 DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 458 OF 2025 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 10. 03. 2025 IN WP(C) NO. 42780 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONERS: 1 REMA S AGED 57 YEARS W/O. LATE E. M. MAHESH KUMAR, ERAMATH SREE MOHANAM, KRISHNA NAGAR, KNRA 103, PEROORKADA P. O. , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695005 2 R. RATHNAVALLY AGED 69 YEARS W/O. K. UPENDRAN, 24/1806, TC 11/669, KARIYARAVILAKAM, NANDANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695003 3 RAJAKUMAR. R AGED 54 YEARS S/O. RAJAPPAN KUZHIVILAKATHUVEEDU, PADMAVILASAM LANE, PEROORKADA P. O. , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695005 4 SANAL KUMAR D AGED 57 YEARS 2025:KER:31186 2 S/O. DIVAKARAPANICKER, DEVIKABHAVAN, ENIKKARA, KARAKULAM P. O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695564 BY ADV R. S. KALKURA RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS: 1 RENUKA DEVI AGED 56 YEARS D/O.
SULOCHANA DEVI, TC 9/1032, SASTHAMANGALAM ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695010 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 3 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR LA (KIFBI) UNIT NO. 1, KANAKA NAGAR, KOWDIAR P. O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695003 4 KERALA INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT FUND BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 2ND FLOOR, FELICITY SQUARE, MG ROAD, STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695001 BY SRI. RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, GOVT. PLEADER THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10. 04. 2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:31186 3 T. R. RAVI, J. -------------------------------------------- R. P. No. 458 of 2025 in W. P. (C) No.
42780 of 2024 --------------------------------------------th Dated this the 10 day of April, 2025 ORDER The review petition has been filed stating that the contention regarding the portion which has not been acquired has not been considered in the judgment and the grievance of the petitioners is regarding the portion which is remaining, they have modified and earmarked and they are continuing their tenancy. The contention that the said aspect has not been considered is correct. In the above circumstances, the judgment is reviewed and recalled. The writ petition is restored on file. Sd/- T. R. RAVI JUDGE Pn 2025:KER:31186 4 APPENDIX OF RP 458/2025 PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 08. 02. 2025 ISSUED BY RAHUL M. TO THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 13. 02. 2025 ISSUED BY THE STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER&DEPUTY TAHSILDAR UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.