K.Srinivas v. State of Telangana (Revenue Department)
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-06-09. K.Srinivas v. State of Telangana (Revenue Department). Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[ 3300 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 6305 OF 2019 Between: K. Srinivas, S/o. Sathaiah, aged 58 years, Tahsildar, Narva Mandal, NarayanaPet District. ... PETITIONER AND l. State of Telangana (Revenue Department), Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, HYderabad, 2. The Special Chief Secretary and Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Hvderabad. 3. The District Collector, Malkajgiri-tvledcal District. 4 The Joint Collector, Ivlalkajgiri-tvledcal District. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affldavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus calling for the records relating to CCLAs Proc. No. VSI(2)/99912015 from the file of the 2nd Respondent and quash the Order Dtd.
18-12-2018 passed therein in imposing major penalty of withholding (3) annual increments with cumulative effect on the petitioner as illegal, unlust, against the principles of natural justice, in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of lndia, consequently direct the respondents herein to restore the annual increments forthwith that were denied pursuant to the impugned order. fA NO: 1 OF 2019 '1 Petition under Section 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Order Dld. 18-12-2018 passed by the 2nd respondent in Proc. No:VS l(2)/999/201 5 imposing major penalty of withholding (3) annual increments with cumulative effect against me in the interest of justrce. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N. RAMESH KUMAR (NOT PRESENT) Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAXA WRIT PETITION No.
63O5 OF 2Or9 ORDER:- 1. No rcpresentation for the peti[ioner on cail. 2. A perusal o[ proceeding sheet discloses that Lhere was no represenlation for the petitioners on 30. O8. 2024, 03. O4. 202. 5 and 28. 04. 20'25. Evcn today, though the matter is listcd under the caption 'For Dismissal", lhcre is no representation on behalt of the petitioner. It seems th;rt the petitioncr is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Hcnce, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution Thcre shall be no order as to costs. 4. Misce llancous pctitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// . ,/ \L. ::'j:" To sEcnoN o FFICER 1 One CC to SRt N,RAMESH \ 1. l KUTUA R, Advocate 2 Two CCs to ON. ,C] Gi FOR REVEN UE, High Court Hyderabad fo r the State of Telangana, ourl at 3,7wo CD Cop res PSK- GJP HIGH COURT i DATED:0910612025 ORDER WP. No. 6305 of 2019 TItE R o t 6 ('-o ( c. ) 1 6 JUL 2025 t ,i) . ), * ,)A,:.
t DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.