BHARAT KOLI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
Court: Allahabad High Court
Bench: BRIJ RAJ SINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
Allahabad High Court judgment dated 2024-12-10. BHARAT KOLI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:82490 Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11224 of 2024 Applicant :- Bharat Koli Opposite Party :- State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Satyam Singh,Ravindra Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G. A. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard Ms. Sonal Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri Satyam Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A. G. A. for the State and perused the record. The present application under Section 482 Cr. P. C. has been preferred for a direction being issued to concerned court below to accept a personal bond and two sureties in all three cases being Case Crime No. 480 of 2024 under Sections 304(2), 317(2) BNSS ; Case Crime No. 348 of 2024 under Sections 304(2), 317(2) BNSS; Case Crime No. 332 of 2024 under Section 304(2) BNSS pertaining to Police Station Krishna Nagar, District Lucknow.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in three cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the competent courts. He says that the applicant is a very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U. P. Learned A. G. A. has no objection. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs.
20,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 10. 12. 2024 Pks Digitally signed by :-Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETHPOOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow BenchLucknow Bench
Source: Allahabad High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.