AXXXXX AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Bench: MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Punjab and Haryana judgment dated 2025-08-21. AXXXXX AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 104 CRWP-7154-2025 Date of Decision: 21. 08. 2025 AXXXXX AND ANR ... Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL **** Present: Mr. Hitesh Chopra, Advocate for the petitioners. **** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL, J. (ORAL) The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 seeks a direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. Respondent No. 3 is also sought to be directed to decide representation dated 27. 06. 2025 (Annexure P-1) submitted by the petitioners, in a time bound manner. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate direction is issued to respondent No. 3- Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur, Punjab to consider and decide representation dated 27. 06.
2025 (Annexure P-1) moved by petitioners and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner. Notice of motion to official respondents only. CRWP-7154-2025 -2- Mr. Hardeep Singh Wadhwa, DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that the needful shall be done in due course. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by counsel for petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 3- Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur, Punjab to decide the aforesaid representation dated 27. 06. 2025 (Annexure P-1) submitted by petitioners within a period of one month from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and take necessary action, if so required. However, if, respondent No. 3 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation (Annexure P-1), the petitioners shall be informed as per mandate of law.
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) AUGUST 21, 2025. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.