VUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO v. M. HANMI REDDY
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-29. VUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO v. M. HANMI REDDY. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO. THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR CRIMINA L PETITION NO: 2791 OF 2018 Between: Vunnam Venkateswara Rao Sio. Kotaiah aged 50 years' R/o lr/adlqpqtgI. Yg9. i. ggnd' wanOit, Ntrammam District. .. lpertfiOrueR/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT AND 1. I\,4orthala Hanmi Reddy S/o. Gopaiah , R/o tr,4othinagar, Kalva Voddu, Khammam District. 2. The state of Telangana, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High court at Hyderabad ... RESPONDENT/ ACCUSED Petition under section 482 of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the tVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be ple,ased to quash the crl. MP. No . 493 of 2012 on the file of Judicial lvlagistrate of First class at Khammam, order dated 31-01-2018. t. A. NO : 1 OF 2018 Petition under section 482 of cr. P .
c praying that in the circumstances stated in the [\,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedlngs in cc. No. 493 of 2O12 on the file of ll Additional Judicial t\,4agistrate of First Class at Khammam This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lvemorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri SRINIVASA RAO VEERAMACHANENI, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 2 and for the Respondent No. 1 not appearing in person or by Advocate The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T, VINOD KUMAR Criminal Petition No. 2791 of2O18 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is fi1ed under Section 4g2 of Cr. p. C. seeking to quash the order dated 31. 01. 201g passed in Crl. M. p. No. 29 oi 2O 18 in CC No. 493 of 2072 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Khammam, wherein the petitioner herein is the de facto complainant.
Today, the matter is listed under ,infructuous the caption matters' and when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Additional Public prosecutor based on e-court status submits that the de facto complainant and the accused have settled the matter before the Lok Adalat. As a resuit of the settlement so arrived between the parties before Lok Adalat, the CC No. 493 of 2072 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Khammam, was disposed of on 09. 03. 2019. In view of the above said submission, no further orders need be passed in the present criminal petition. Accordingly, the criminal petition is closed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to file a petition seeking to reopen the matter, in the event the said CC has not been disposed of by the trial Court as noted above. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition shall stand closed. s d/- N. GHAN D Rfr ? #[+sr[tR ,TRUE COPY// OFFTCER SECTION To 1. 2.
k:if iilf lffifr " "' "' ffi *'$[*td{lii[['si,? r 3. iHffiq{ Advocate [oPUC] RAo vEERAMAcHANENT' sRlNrvAsA 4. 3llT3? 3ot*' Advocate [OPUC] to C' SHARAN REDDY' 5. One CC SRl. 6. Two CD CoPies . )-- "\ HIGH COURT TVKJ DATED:2911212020 ORDER CRLP. No. 2791 of 2018 OF rEii\ '(i'i\ I le lo il llL . l CLOSNC THE CRL. PETITION. o *S' v'
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.