UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. v. M/S BHASKAR CONSTRUCTION CO. AND ANR.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2024-11-06. UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. v. M/S BHASKAR CONSTRUCTION CO. AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
Serial No. 01 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC (CRP) No. 16 of 2024 in CRP No. 25 of 2024 Date of Decision: 06. 11. 2024 1. Union of India represented by The Chief Engineer, Shillong, Zone, Spread Eagles Falls, Shillong 793011. 2. Commander Works Engineer, Spread Eagles Falls, Shillong 793011. 3. The Garrison Engineer, Narangi, Guwahati. … Applicant(s) - Versus - 1. M/s Bhaskar Construction Co. 5/2 N. C. Sen Avenue, Dum Dum Kolkata, 700080. 2. Brig. S. S. Virdi (Retd. ), Ex-Chief Engineer J & K Zone, Director of Works Army and Director of Works Navy H No. 14 Sector 10, Chandigarh-160 011. … Respondent(s) Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s): Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with Ms. K. Gurung, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. W. A. Wanswett, Adv. __________________________________________________________ i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.
: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No ORDER 1. This is an application for interim stay of the order dated 04. 10. 2024, passed by the learned Additional Deputy Commissioner (J), East Khasi Hills, Shillong in Misc. Case No. 113 (T) of 2023. 2. The applicants/petitioners in the main petition are aggrieved with the impugned order dated 04. 10. 2024, whereby the condonation application for preferring an appeal, has been rejected. 3. Dr. N. Mozika, learned DSGI assisted by Ms. K. Gurung, learned counsel for the applicants/petitioners prays that while the matter is under consideration before this Court, some protection be given to the applicants/petitioners. 4. Mr. W. A. Wanswett, learned counsel for the respondent submits that interim orders will be of no use, inasmuch as, the award has already been executed, and the respondent has received the entire awarded amount, however, with a direction that 50% be kept in a Fixed Deposit, till December. 5.
In this view of the matter, no interim orders are called for at this stage, and this Misc. Case is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Meghalaya 06. 11. 2024 “V. Lyndem-PS” Signature Not Verified Page 3 of 3 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2024. 11. 06 17:21:46 IST
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.