M/S. JITENDRA PRASAD GUPTA, REPRESENTED THRO ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR NAMELY JITENDRA PRASAD GUPTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2026-03-09. M/S. JITENDRA PRASAD GUPTA, REPRESENTED THRO ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR NAMELY JITENDRA PRASAD GUPTA v. THE...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 1362 of 2026 1. M/s. Jitendra Prasad Gupta, represented through its sole proprietor namely Jitendra Prasad Gupta, having its registered office at Bhagalpur, Tandwa, P. O:- Dol, P. S:- Dhurki, Dist:- Garhwa. 2. Jitendra Prasad Gupta, aged about 48 years, son of Aliyar Prasad Gupta, resident of Ward No. 20, Bhagalpur, Tandwa, P. O:- Dol, P. S:- Dhurki, Dist:-Garhwa. ... ... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Department of Rural Works, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at FFP Building, P. O & P. S:- Dhurwa, Dhurwa, Dist:-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Chief Engineer, Jharkhand State Rural Roads Development Authority (JSRRDA), 3rd Floor, FFP Building, Dhurwa, P. O & P. S:- Dhurwa, Ranchi. 4. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Chakradharpur, P. O & P. S:-Chakradharpur, Dist:- West Singhbhum, Jharkhand. 5. The Project Officer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, P. O & P.
S:- Chakradharpur, Chakradharpur, Dist:- West Singhbhum. 6. The Assistant Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Sub- Division, Manoharpur, P. O & P. S:-Chakradharpur, Dist:- West Singhbhum, Jharkhand. ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioners: Mr. Ankur Anand, Advocate. Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Sharon Toppo, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A. C. to A. G. --------- 02/Dated: 09. 03. 2026 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr. Ankur Anand, the learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing the matter for some time, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise the disputes raised therein before the appropriate forum. 3. Leave is granted to withdraw this petition with liberty as prayed for. 4. All contentions of all parties are however left open because we have not examined any of the rival contentions. No costs. 5.
Any interim applications therein are also disposed of. (M. S. Sonak, C. J. ) (Rajesh Shankar, J. ) 09. 03. 2026 APK/VK
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.