BACHAN SINGH & ANR. ETC. v. CHHOTU RAM & ORS. ETC

Citation: [1986] 3 S.C.R. 378

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, RANGANATH MISRA

Case summary

So far as facts of this case are concerned, the plaintiffs must be presumed to have had a right to pre-empt on the date of sale. 639/85 has, therefore, to be allowed and the decree passed by the trial Court as upheld in the first and second appeals must be reversed.

Judgment text

So far as facts of this case are concerned, the plaintiffs must be presumed to have had a right to pre-empt on the date of sale. 639/85 has, therefore, to be allowed and the decree passed by the trial Court as upheld in the first and second appeals must be reversed.