COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P., LUCKNOW v. BRITISH INDIA CORPN. LTD., KANPUR

Citation: [1987] 2 S.C.R. 133

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: SABYASACHI MUKHERJI, S. NATARAJAN

Case summary

50,000 was a capital expenditure which could not be allowed as a deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922?

Judgment text

50,000 was a capital expenditure which could not be allowed as a deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922?