GENERAL OFFICER COMMANDING-IN-CHIEF & ANR. v. SUBHASH CHANDRA YADAV & ANR

Citation: [1988] 3 S.C.R. 62

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: RANGANATH MISRA, M.M. DUTT

Case summary

It is urged on behalf of the appellants that in view of sub-section (2) of ~ section 281, rule 5-C became a part of the statute and, accordingly, the question of its being contrary to the provisions of the Cantonment Act does not at all arise....

Judgment text

It is urged on behalf of the appellants that in view of sub-section (2) of ~ section 281, rule 5-C became a part of the statute and, accordingly, the question of its being contrary to the provisions of the Cantonment Act does not at all arise....