HARI CHAND @ HARISH CHANDRA v. SHRI DAULAT RAM

Citation: [1986] 3 S.C.R. 1029

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: A.P. SEN, B.C. RAY

Case summary

3/1 and 3/2 respectively and held that the disputed property fell to the share of the plaintiffs vendor and the correctness of the partition map was not challenged in the written statement. The defendant therefore, states that the suit is liable to be dismissed.

Judgment text

3/1 and 3/2 respectively and held that the disputed property fell to the share of the plaintiffs vendor and the correctness of the partition map was not challenged in the written statement. The defendant therefore, states that the suit is liable to be dismissed.