Kondam Yellaiah, v. The Dist Collector,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2022-12-12. Kondam Yellaiah, v. The Dist Collector,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 32e6l IN. THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITIoN NO: OF 20Q7 1531. 2 Betvreen: Kondam Yellaiah, S/o. Kanakaiah, Hindu, Agriculturist, R/o. Bheemavaram(V), Warangal Dist. ... PETITIONER . A. ND i. The Dist Collector, Warangal Dist. -the 2. Special Deputy Collecto(L. A), Sriram Sagar Project, Warangal Dist. lJ. The Tahsildar, Hasanparthy (M), Warangal Dist. 4 Sri l/i. A l-laleem A. E, SRSP Camp,Hasanparthy(M),Warangal Dist. 5 Executive Engineer, DEE Sub-Divisional-lV,JCR,GLlP,Kakatiya Canal Camp, Chitagattu(V), Hasanparthy(M), ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ declaring in pursuance of representation dated 06-07-2007 of the Petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary io prcvisions of the Land Acquisition act and is in violation of Article 21 of the constifution of lndia. is iPrayer amended as per Court Order dated 0111112007 in WPMP No. 26640 of 2007) LA. lt0: 1 OF 2007(WPfuP. NO: 19332 OF 2007) Petition under S€ction 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in s rpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation dt. 6-7-2007. Counsel for the Petitiorer: SRI V. PADMANABHA RAO (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respordent No. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respordent No. 4 to 5: - - - - T.
he'Court made the follciwing: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 15312 OF 2OO7 ORDER: Since there was no representation for the petitioner on 07. 12. 2022 and 05. 12. 2022, the matter was directed to be listed on 12. 12. 2022 under the caption 'for dismissal". Today also there is no representation for the petitioner. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/-I. NAGALAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI V. PADMANABHA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana lourl 3. Two CD Copies BN S \,I,, \-\:- HIG}{ COURT DATED:12112121t22 L o4 + . et c-r: 1{ c\i ,q et a C\J l) e c rt I u c ? I crl I d. r) \\. ORDER r{ ^. )" WP. No. 15312 ol 2007 I DISMISSING TTIE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS c'\