LAGDISH SUGAR MILLS LTD. v. THE C.I.T LUCKNOW

Citation: [1986] 3 S.C.R. 198

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: R.S. PATHAK, SABYASACHI MUKHERJI

Case summary

, [1964] 54 ITR 315 has been placed before us but nothing said therein is truly apposite to the limited question before us. But contrary to the view taken by the Income-tax Officer, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that ' the ai·,essee was entitled to substitute the...

Judgment text

, [1964] 54 ITR 315 has been placed before us but nothing said therein is truly apposite to the limited question before us. But contrary to the view taken by the Income-tax Officer, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that ' the ai·,essee was entitled to substitute the...