Skip to main content

M.L. JAIN v. UNION OF INDIA

Citation: [1988] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 496

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: A.P. SEN, S. NATARAJAN

Case summary

26,000 per annum and for an appropriate direction for re-determination of his pension and other pensionary benefits in view of the change in law brought about by High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Amendment Acts, 1986 and 1988 B' (Act Nos.

Judgment text

26,000 per annum and for an appropriate direction for re-determination of his pension and other pensionary benefits in view of the change in law brought about by High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Amendment Acts, 1986 and 1988 B' (Act Nos.