MRS. WINIFRED ROSS & ANR. v. MRS. IVY FONSECA & ORS (2)

Citation: [1984] 1 S.C.R. 1005

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, R.B. MISRA

Case summary

Since such an inte'rpretation is Jike~y to expose the provision to a successful Challenge under. The High Court Of Bombay held that he could not avail himself of the benefit of section 13Al of the Act as he had not let out the building while he was in the army.

Judgment text

Since such an inte'rpretation is Jike~y to expose the provision to a successful Challenge under. The High Court Of Bombay held that he could not avail himself of the benefit of section 13Al of the Act as he had not let out the building while he was in the army.