M/S. MOTIPUR ZAMINDARY CO. (P) LTD. v. THE STATE OF BIHAR
Citation: [1962] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 498; 1961 INSC 317
Court: Supreme Court of India
Bench: BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA , J.L. KAPUR, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J.C. SHAH, J.R. MUDHOLKAR
Judgment date:
Case summary
1961 INSC 317. Supreme Court of India judgment dated 1961-11-20. M/S. MOTIPUR ZAMINDARY CO. (P) LTD. v. THE STATE OF BIHAR. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
(l) S. C. R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 499 498 SUPREME OOURT REPORTS [1962] SPPP. enquiry nnder s. 36A. It is clear thnt in substance tho ar~nmeut is that the direction isaued by the award in regard to the payment in question should be mo ding intended to enable the tribunal to review or modify its own order; it is intended to enable the tribunal only to clarify the provisions of its a'mrd where a difficulty or doubt arises about the interpretation of the provision. ~. Quito clearly the impugned provisions contained in paragraph I 4 of the award in r dings. The result is the appeal fails and is dismiRSerl with costs. A pperil diamia. ~Pd. M/S. MOTIPUR ZAMINDARY CO. (P) LTD. v. THE STATE OF RIHAR (R. P. RmTIA, c .. T. , . T. r•. KAPUR, M. HmAYATUJ. T. AH, J. C. SHAH and J. R. MunHOLKAR, JJ. ) Salu Ta. y,--Exemplion of green 1JPqe/able. 1qar cant. , whether a dtalt. r-Bihar Sak• Ta. -r Acl, 1.? 47 (Bihar 19 of 1947), .. ,, 2(c), 6-Noti{ication No.
9881-F 7 dat&l Auqust 28, lf/47- Rihar Annual Finance Act, 1950. Under s. 6 of the llihar Sales Tax Act, 1947, the Government issued a notification e. "(empting cert;lin goocls from the payment of sales tax, including "green vegetables other than pot-1toes, except \vhen sold in sealed containers". ~fhe appellant who was a prodl1cer of sugar cane was assessed to saies tax. He contended that sugar cane \Vas a green vegetable and was exempted from tax and that he was not a deakr as dofined in s. 2 ( c) of the Act and could not be assessed to sales tax. Held, that sugar cane was not a green vegetable and wa. not exen1pted under the notification. The word ''vegetables" in taxing statutes was to be understood as in common parlance i. e. denoting class of vegetables \vhich were grown in a kitchen garden or in a farm and were used for the table. The 1 dictionaries defined sugar cane as a ''grass. ' Rn. mavtar Bndhoiprasad v.
A"sistanf 8ale1 Ta, ntioned in the notification: Provided no notification shall be issued under this section without giving in the Official Gazette such previous notice as the State Government may consider reasonable, of its intention to issue such notificati_on. '' Under s. 6 of the Act the notification relied upon was issued on August 28, 1947, This was notifica· tion No. 9884-FT which was in the follo~ing terms:- "In exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act. , 1947 (Bihar Act XIX of 1947), and in supersession of all the previous notifications on the subject the Govemor of Bihar is pleased to direct that no tax shall be payable under the said Act on tho sale of goods specified in tbe second column of the schedule hereto annexed subject to the excJptions, if any, set out in the corresponding entry in the third column thereof. I ---·~---=--~--===---------- 502 SUPREME COUHT REPORTS [1962] SUPP.
'l'JTE SCHEDULE Serial Descri1ition Exception subject to which the No. ·of goods. exemption has been allowed. l .......... , ....... ·. 2 ........ ; ........ . 3;;; . • : .. : .... •••. • '4 •••. ••• ~ . •. ••••... -5 ... -~ ......... --;~. ~-.. 6 Green vegetables Except wlw1i sold m sealed other than pota- containers. toes. ................................................................... " . : The ,question raised is that sugar cane-· falls ,,vitl1in the . term "green vegetables" in ·entry: 6, of tho Schedulo - and is therefore exempt from assessment to Sales tax. · In support of this contention· counsel for the 11ppellant relied upon a judgment of the Bombay High Court, The State of Bom/;ayv. R. S. Pliarltara(1) where it was held that sugar cane is "fresh . vegetable". and is therefore exempt from sales tax under. a similar notification issued under the Bombay Bales Tax Act. Chagla C. J. , thero observed at page ·196 as follo\vs_::-:7 ' '. _; ' _ . "In· its plain and.
natural meaning . a "vegetable" clearly is wide. enough to cover "sugar cane";. but _what . is ,urged by the Ad- ·voeate -General is· that we must not give it that wide meaning but must give it the popular meaning · as understood . by, people who _. · deal in. vegetables . or ·cat vegetables, and it is urged that· from that narrow and restricted point of. view _sugar eane is not vegetable. ·. This is a taxing statute and if two constructions are· possible we must lean in favour 'of 'that construction which gives relief to the subject. -That was exactly the (I) (1956] 7 S. T. C. ~95. approch of the Sales Tax Tribunal and in our opinion that approch was a very proper one. " This observation is not in accord with the opinion given by this Court in Ramwytar Badhriprasad v. Assistant Sales Ta. v Officer, Akola ( ') in which under a1i almost identical entry it was held that "betel leaves" is not included in the term "vege-ta hies".
After quoting with approval a passage from the judgment of the Nagpur High Court, . Madhya Pradesh Pan . Merchants Association v. State of :Madhya Prade8h (') this court said : "the word "vegetable" in taxing statutes is to ho understood as in common parlance i. e. denoting class of vegetables which are grown in a kitchen garden or in a farm and are used for the table. " If that is the meaning of the word "vegetables" sugar cane cannot fail within entry 6 which relates to green vegetables. In Webster's dictionary "sugar cane" has been defined as "a grass exten-sively grown in tropical and warm regions for its sugar" and in Oxford dictionary it is defined as "a tall peronnial grass cultivated in tropical and sub-tropical countries a:nd forming the chief source of unmanufactured sugar". Therefore it cannot be said that sugar cane falls within the definition of the words "green vegetable'. '. The second question which was raised before us and which arises in the petitions under Art.
32 is that the appellant company is not a "dealer" within the meaning of the word as defined in s. 2(c) of the Act which is as follows :- " "dea. ler" means any persqn who sells or supplies any goods (including goods sold . or supplied in the execution of a contract) (l) A. I. ll. [1961] S. C. 1325. (2) [1956] 7 S. T. C. 99. 504 SUPREME OOUH. T REPORTS [1962) SUPP. whether for commission, remuneration or otherwise and includes any firm or a Hindu joint family, tho Government and any society club or associa. tion which sells or supplies goods to its mem hers". The words of this sub-section are very wide and cover the case of tho appellant and therefore this point is also with! Jut substance and must be reject-ed. But it was argued that the definition of the word "dealer" in the Act which was amended bv Bihar Annual Finance Art 1950 is a.
pplicablc only for the financial year beginning April l, 1950, and not for subsequent years and for that aid was sought from the preamble to the Bihar Annual Finance Act 1950. That preamble is as follows: - "\Vhcreai; it is expedient to amend the Bihar 8alcs T;1x Act, 194 7, and the Bihar Agricultural Income Tax Act, 19·18, to levy a tax on pas8engers and goods carried by public service vehicles and public carr iera and to lay down rates on Sales Tax payable under Hihar Sales Tax Att 194i to fix limit of taxable agricultural iuc! Jmc to lay down rates of agricultural Income Tax Act and l:iupor Tax chargeable under Bihar Agricultural Incom~ 'l'ax Act, 19~8 for the financial year beginning on the ! st 111t an•l th.. reforc tho amended section is applicable to the present caS('. It is an erroneous approach to the question to say that because of the words "for the financial year beginning on the first of April l!
Ji}()" in the p:utim-lar context in the preamble, the <lefinition of the word "dealer" was a. mended only for one year Nothing has been shown indicating that section ~ I (2)( i) of Bihar Annul Finance Act intended to effect a temporary amendment in the previous definition of the word "dealer" in cl( c) of s. 2 of the Act. The contention is therefore repelled. It was also submitted that the assent of the President was not given to the Bihar Annual Finance Aot 1950. In our opinion that submission iJ equally without force because tax on sale of goo<ls is a matter entirely within entry 54 of the State List and the amendment made in the dtfini-tion of the word "dealer" in the Act did not require the assent of tho President. In our opinion the appeals and the petitions under Art. 32 are without merit and are therefore dismissed with costs. One hearing fee. Appecds and writ petitions dismissed. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, BIHAR AND ANOTHER v. N. BAKSHI (B. P. SINHA, C. J. , J. L. KAPUR, M.
HmAYATULLAII, J. C. SHAH and J. R. MUDHOLKAR, JJ. ) Indian Civil Service-Conditt'ona of Bl. rvfce-F'assage benefits-Statutory right-Constitutional guarantee-Cancella-tion of passage benefit• under ruk making pou·er-Validity- ' 1 Remuntration '', meaning of-Superior Oiv,il ServiceB (Revision of pay and pension) Rule. , 1924-Government of India Act, 1935 (25 & 36 Geo. 5, Oh. 42), s. 247 (1) -Indian Inde-pendence Aet, 1947 (10 &. II Geo. 6, Oh. 30), ss. 10 (2), 19(4)- All India Services Act, 1! 151 (61of1951}, ss. 3,4-Alt India Services (Ot•. r. eas pay, paa•age and leave sa/,ary) Ruka, 1957, r. 3-0onstitution of India, Art. 314. Under the Superior Civil Services (Revision of Pay and Pension) Rules, 1924, framed by the Secretary of State for India-in-Council under the provisions of the Government of India Act, 1919, members of the Indian Civil Service and their wivCJ and children were entitled to passage benefits which
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.