MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI v. GURNAM KAUR

Citation: [1988] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 929

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: A.P. SEN, E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, B.C. RAY

Case summary

), the only point argued was on the question of priority of the claimant's debt, and, on this argument being heard, the Court granted the order. He however held that by virtue of the tehbazari licence granted in their favour, the plaintiffs had acquired the right to occupy...

Judgment text

), the only point argued was on the question of priority of the claimant's debt, and, on this argument being heard, the Court granted the order. He however held that by virtue of the tehbazari licence granted in their favour, the plaintiffs had acquired the right to occupy...