Skip to main content

NAVNIT R. KAMANI & ORS. v. R.R. KAMANI

Citation: [1988] SUPP. 3 S.C.R. 123

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: A.P. SEN, M.P. THAKKAR, S. NATARAJAN

Case summary

We may also mention that the BIFR was wholly right that tl>e provisions of the Act were immune from challenge by virtue of the declaration contained in Section 2 of the Act attracting the application of Art....

Judgment text

We may also mention that the BIFR was wholly right that tl>e provisions of the Act were immune from challenge by virtue of the declaration contained in Section 2 of the Act attracting the application of Art....