PATHUMMA AND ANR v. MOHAMMAD (2)

Citation: [1988] 2 S.C.R. 731

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: V. KHALID, M.M. DUTT

Case summary

) The High Court in its revisional jurisdiction was not justified in substituting its own view for that of the learned Magistrate on a question of fact. 2, was set aside and the entire application of the appellants under section 125 Cr.

Judgment text

) The High Court in its revisional jurisdiction was not justified in substituting its own view for that of the learned Magistrate on a question of fact. 2, was set aside and the entire application of the appellants under section 125 Cr.