RAJPAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
Citation: [1995] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 481; 1995 INSC 756
Court: Supreme Court of India
Bench: K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA
Judgment date:
Case summary
1995 INSC 756. Supreme Court of India judgment dated 1995-11-20. RAJPAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
482 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1995) SUPP. 5 S. C. R. RAJPAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. NOVEMBER 20, 1995 [K. RAMASWAMY AND B. L. HANSARIA, JJ. ] Service Law: Regulmisation-Similarly situated persons already regularised-Appellant to be taken into se1vice and regularised-However, he will not be entitled to back wages but shall get all other consequential benefits. In this appeal against the High Court's order, the appellant prayed for regularisation. Allowing the appeal, this Court HELD : 1. Since the persons similarly situated were admittedly taken into service and their services have been regularised, the appellant, who is the only person left out in the field, also stands in the same position. On this special circumstances, he is also entitled to the same relief. [482-B] 2. The respondents are directed to take the appellant int9 service within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of this order.
But the appellant would not be entitled to the back-wages; he would, however, get all other consequential benefits. [482-C) CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 11401 of 1995. From the Judgment and Order dated 8. 9. 92 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in RS. A. No. 1065 of 1992. S. M. Hooda, Mahinder Singh Dahiya for the Appellant. Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal and Ms. lndu Malhotra for the Respondents. The following Order of the Court was delivered : Delay condoned. Leave granted. In view of the order passed by this Court in S. L. P. (C) Nos. 3099- 3100/85 & batch, the persons similarly situated were admittedly taken into service and their services have been regularised. Under these circumstances, since the appellant, who is the only person left out in the field, also stands in the same position, we think, on this special circumstances, he is also entitled to the same relief. The appeal is accordingly allowed.
But the appellant would not be entitled to the back-wages; he would, however, get all other consequential benefits. The respondents are directed to take the appellant into service within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of this order. G. N. Appeal allowed.
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.