S. GOVINDARAJU v. K.S.R.T.C. & ANR

Citation: [1986] 2 S.C.R. 509

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, K.N. SINGH

Case summary

The validity of Section 2(oo)(bb) was not challenged before us. There is no dispute that the appellant was allowed to be in continuous service for a period of more than one year and while he was in continuous service the impugned ~ order of termination was issued in...

Judgment text

The validity of Section 2(oo)(bb) was not challenged before us. There is no dispute that the appellant was allowed to be in continuous service for a period of more than one year and while he was in continuous service the impugned ~ order of termination was issued in...