STATE OF GUJARAT v. JAT LAXMANJI TALASJI

Citation: [1988] 2 S.C.R. 1068

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: M.P. THAKKAR, K.N. SINGH, N.D. OJHA

Case summary

It is not in dispute that the family of the land-holder consisted of 9 members if the heads of the members of the family are counted. - The Revenue Tribunal held that the landholder was not entitled to the benefit of s.

Judgment text

It is not in dispute that the family of the land-holder consisted of 9 members if the heads of the members of the family are counted. - The Revenue Tribunal held that the landholder was not entitled to the benefit of s.