Skip to main content

STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. HINDUSTAN SUGAR MILLS LTD. & ORS

Citation: [1988] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 461

Court: Supreme Court of India

Bench: M.P. THAKKAR, B.C. RAY

Case summary

They could not have sought shelter under the umbrella of proviso (b) to sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Act, having regard to the fact that the enhancement was being enforced for the first time in the four-year block commencing on June 1, 1970....

Judgment text

They could not have sought shelter under the umbrella of proviso (b) to sub-section (3) of Section 9 of the Act, having regard to the fact that the enhancement was being enforced for the first time in the four-year block commencing on June 1, 1970....